ISO 27001 & SOC 2 Readiness
Close the gaps and prepare for certification or audit.
Information Security Gap & Risk Assessment
ThreatGaurd measures your security programme against ISO 27001, NIST CSF and other recognised frameworks, identifies your most significant risks, and gives leadership a prioritised roadmap with clear owners and timelines.
Why it matters
Boards, regulators, customers and insurers all expect a clear answer to a simple question: how well protected is the organisation? Without an independent assessment, that answer is often based on assumptions, tool reports or the last audit.
An information security gap and risk assessment gives you an evidence-based view of your controls and risks today, and a realistic plan to close the gaps that matter most to the business.
Security budgets go to tools and projects without a clear link to the risks that matter most.
Leaders are asked about cyber risk, but lack a simple, defensible view to report.
ISO 27001, SOC 2 and new regulations set clear expectations, but the distance from today to compliance is unclear.
Business outcomes
An independent view of your current maturity across every security area.
Know which risks matter most, based on likelihood and impact to the business.
Prioritised actions with owners, effort and timelines, ready for budgeting.
A clear route to ISO 27001, SOC 2 and the other frameworks you need.
Maturity profile
Your report shows current and target maturity for each NIST CSF 2.0 function on a 1 to 5 scale, so leaders can see where investment will make the biggest difference.
What we assess
We assess each domain against the frameworks that matter to you, using documents, interviews and technical sampling.
Leadership, ownership and the policies that set direction.
How risks are identified, assessed, owned and treated.
The human and supplier side of security.
The technical safeguards that protect systems and data.
How sensitive and personal data is collected, stored and shared.
How well you would spot, handle and recover from an incident.
Methodology
We use the frameworks your customers, auditors and regulators recognise, and agree the right approach with you during scoping.
Your controls measured against one framework, such as ISO 27001 or NIST CSF, with a clear list of gaps.
Best for
Preparing for certification or a specific requirement.
Most common
Framework gaps combined with a business risk assessment, so actions are prioritised by real risk.
Best for
Most organisations. One view of compliance and risk.
An asset- and threat-based risk assessment, with a risk register and treatment plan.
Best for
Organisations building or refreshing risk management.
How it works
01
We agree the business units, systems and frameworks in scope, and the people we need to speak to. An NDA is signed before work begins.
02
We review policies and records, interview key people and sample technical controls to confirm what happens in practice.
03
We rate each control area, identify gaps and assess risks by likelihood and business impact.
04
We prioritise actions into a realistic roadmap with owners, effort and timelines.
05
We walk your leadership team, and board if needed, through the findings and the plan.
Deliverables
| 5 | none | none | 1 | 1 | none |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | none | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | none |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | none | none |
| 1 | 2 | 1 | none | none | none |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Risks above appetite
7of 21 assessed
Top risk
No tested incident response plan for a ransomware attack
Related services
Close the gaps and prepare for certification or audit.
Meet GDPR, DPDP Act and sector privacy requirements.
Ongoing security leadership to deliver the roadmap.
Test your technical controls the way an attacker would.
FAQ
Can’t find your answer? Our team is happy to help.
A gap assessment compares your controls with a framework, such as ISO 27001, and shows what is missing. A risk assessment looks at your assets and threats to decide which risks matter most to the business. We usually combine both, so gaps are prioritised by real risk.
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0, CIS Controls, SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria, PCI DSS, and privacy requirements such as GDPR and India’s DPDP Act. One assessment can also be mapped to several frameworks at once.
No. It is an independent advisory assessment that shows where you stand and what to do next. Certifications and audit opinions are issued by accredited certification bodies and auditors, and this assessment is often the first step towards them.
Usually leadership, IT and security, HR, legal or compliance, and the owners of key systems. Interviews are short and scheduled around your teams.
Yes, by sampling. We check configurations and records to confirm that key controls work in practice, not just on paper. For deeper technical testing, the assessment can be combined with VAPT or a cloud security assessment.
Common triggers include preparing for ISO 27001 or SOC 2, a new security leader, a board or investor request, customer due diligence, regulatory change, or a recent security incident. Many organisations repeat it every year to track progress.
Most assessments take 2 to 4 weeks, depending on the size of the organisation, the number of frameworks and the locations in scope.
Cost depends on the size and complexity of the organisation, the frameworks in scope and the approach you choose. After the scoping call you receive a fixed-scope proposal, so the cost is agreed before work starts.
Get started
Tell us about your organisation and the frameworks that matter to you. We will come back with a clear scope and proposal, with no obligation.